Tourism and Transport for City Cycle Tram-myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theTourism and Transport for City Cycle Tram. Answer: Introduction The Australian tourism industry has contributed a lot to the countrys overall economy. Moreover, it has gained better opportunities while giving transportation facilities to its tourists or visitors from all across the world (Bagloee et al., 2017). The purpose of this report is to analyze the relationship between the tourism and transportation through comparative analysis of city circle tram and Melbourne sightseeing tour bus. The Melbourne sightseeing tour bus is mainly the tourist oriented bus service, which provides the visitors with transportation facilities in Melbourne, a city of Australia. A driver operates the bus and assists the tourists to travel all across the city parts (Blanke Chiesa, 2013). The City Circle Tram has similar facilities; however the report gives a detailed analysis of both the transportation facilities. Strengths and Weaknesses of both the products The strengths and weaknesses of the tourism products are being discussed in this part of the report, which is related to the economic development plans. These factors comprise of various aspects, taking into consideration, the free services being offered to the tourists by the government officials. The Melbourne sightseeing tour bus and the City Cycle Tram provides its visitors with similar kind of services that are much linked with each other. The strengths of both the products can be analyzed in their services, funded by the government officials. The route for both the transport system encircles mainly the middle of the city, along with thirteen stops of tourist destinations (Darcy, Cameron Schweinsberg, 2012). The services run daily, with an interval of around thirty minutes in total. The timings mainly start from 9 am to 4 pm. The transport facilities are related and the government officials has provided the tourists with some added benefits like nominal pay rates, entertainment and visit to the main destination spots of the city (Masiero Zoltan, 2013). This has added to the economic development of the country as well. However, with strengths, come weaknesses, as well. It is true that the transportation facilities offered by the government officials has benefitted the tourists in a huge way, but at the same time there are issues like traffic congestion, population high petrol prices and emissions. In addition to this, the most frustrating part is the journeys and waits between the services. This is especially a problem during the peak tourism seasons. Moreover, safety is also an issue, which majority of the tourists face. Beyond this, the transportation facilities are poor and infrequent particularly at the weekends (Lund-Durlacher Dimanche, 2013). This is not even a competition for the motor cars. Therefore, these are the major weaknesses of the citys transportation facilities, along with infrastructure issues. Integration of both the products into Melbournes transport systems Irrespective of the facts that fall into the weakness part, both the services have equally served well for the tourists of Melbourne. The major operations and activities are much similar when there is a comparison between the facilities, in terms of tourist and transportation activities. The Melbourne sightseeing bus has enabled the tourists visit the major destination as well as attraction sports of the city. It starts from the stop at Arts Precint, which is the national gallery named as NGV International. The place has contemporary art, which entertains the art lovers (Azariah, 2012). In addition to this spot, the other spots comprise the Federation square, Olympic Park and more. Both the transportation facilities have helped the tourists explore the places of the city. The Chinatown district entertains the visitors with its majestic theatres, comedy theatres and a princess theatre. Moreover, there are museums in between the destinations that have royal exhibition buildings, Carlton gardens and Old Melbourne places. The Lygon Street, University of Melbourne, Queen Victoria market is covered by both the Melbourne sightseeing bus and city circle tram. Therefore, the transportation facilities are much similar and cover equal entertainment for the tourists (Young, 2013). Tourists get to explore and visit those places and make the most of it, at cheap and affordable rates. Tourists love these affordable services and it both the facilities are engaged into gathering their attention. The world loves the city and its transportation facilities, which have mutually engaged to contribute to the economic development of the country. With the city circle tram, the visitors get to travel destinations like Spring Docklands, Melbourne city, Latrobe Sts and others. Moreover, different routes can be selected as well, while both the services try to cover the major parts of the city of Melbourne (Willard Beeton, 2012). Recommendations for Improvement The government officials should consider making more tourist buses and trams, the backbone of the economic development. The Tourism Board should also invest on this, so that the waiting time reduces. Moreover, they should investigate a proper congestion charge zone for the inner parts of Melbourne. In addition to the above transportation facilities, train routes should also become effective, which will cover the major parts of the city. Furthermore, along with these factors, other issues like pollution and population must also be taken under consideration, so that the tourists do not face any challenges, while travelling. The negative factors include poorer air quality, increased traffic congestion, increased emissions of green house gases must be improved. The government officials are required to work in collaboration with the tourism board, so that they can fight these challenges together. Furthermore, free services along with the transportation facilities, must be provided to the tourists, so that they enjoy their ride. It is to be kept in mind that tourism plays a major role in the overall economic development of the country. Therefore, such recommendations can enable the city increase its tourist heads. Conclusion The tourism and transportation department are interrelated to a huge extent. The transportation department has helped in improving the tourism department to a certain level. It is important for the government officials of Australia, to improve their bus and tram services in order to cater to most number of visitors. Renewing the contracts of the Melbourne sightseeing bus and city circle tram is also considered to be of major significance. The bus and tram services were initially free for the tourists, but afterwards it became payable. Therefore, these factors must be reduced and taken into consideration, for increasing the number of tourist heads, each year. References Azariah, D. R. (2012). When travel meets tourism: Tracing discourse in Tony Wheeler's blog.Critical Studies in Media Communication,29(4), 275-291. Bagloee, S. A., Tavana, M., Di Caprio, D., Asadi, M., Heshmati, M. (2017). A multi-user decision support system for online city bus tour planning.Journal of Modern Transportation,25(2), 59-73. Blanke, J., Chiesa, T. (2013). The travel tourism competitiveness report 2013. InThe World Economic Forum. Darcy, S., Cameron, B., Schweinsberg, S. (2012). Accessible tourism in Australia.Best practice in accessible tourism: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism, 79. Lund-Durlacher, D., Dimanche, F. (2013). Mobilities and sustainable tourism: An introduction.Journal of Sustainable Tourism,21(4), 505-510. Masiero, L., Zoltan, J. (2013). Tourists intra-destination visits and transport mode: A bivariate probit model.Annals of Tourism Research,43, 529-546. Willard, P., Beeton, S. (2012). Low impact experiences: Developing successful rail trail tourism.Tourism Planning Development,9(1), 5-13. Young, A. (2013).Street art, public city: Law, crime and the urban imagination. Routledge.